Just back from 2 weeks in Sri Lanka.
This is a brilliant place for photography - wonderful scenery, exotic birds and other animals, and friendly smiley people who are happy to be photographed.
I left my full-format D700 at home, because the D300 is much more flexible, with its 18-200 VR do-anything lens that I used most of the time, and the 10.5 fisheye. But I also had a 70-200 f2.8 along for a bit more quality and the ability to extend for the bird shots, and then an SB800 flashgun, a close-up accessory lens, and a small carbon tripod.
Not to mention my Canon S90 pocket camera that was always with me, and for example contributed with the pictures of Lotta in the sunset.
I was a bit worried about my full memory cards getting lost or stolen, but with 30 MB at the end it was going to be very tedious to copy them at an internet cafe, and handing them over to a stranger to copy seemed too risky. An iPod or dedicated photo backup device would have been a good solution but I was too mean to buy one just for this trip, so in the end I just locked them in the safe at the hotels, and held very tightly on to my camera bag in between.
More pictures and a full trip report are here : Sri Lanka pictures
Here's a picture taken with the tiny pocket camera that I always have with me :
The weather was bad and I was just taking a quick walk on which I didn't think it was worth lugging my usual 8kg of gear, when I heard sleigh bells through the forest and these guys came galloping past me. I just had time to pull out my Canon S90 and take this shot before they were gone, trailing only the sound of jingle bells.
It was a pretty magical first-of-advent morning, but I would have been mad if I hadn't caught it on 'film'.
If I'd had my DSLR with me the result would have been sharper, less noisy, and I could have taken several frames and chosen one where the position of the horse's hooves better showed how fast they were going, but I didn't, and that's where pocket cameras come into their own. They can always be there.
The downside of pocket cameras is that they have tiny sensors that show more noise, especially in poor light, and can't handle as much contrast as bigger sensors. The cameras tend to be slow to respond too, have limited frame rates, and make terrible indoor portraits if you need to rely on the built-in flash. But for static subjects in good light, A4 prints can be embarrassingly similar to the result from cameras costing and weighing 10 times as much. It's also way cheaper to buy an underwater housing for a pocket camera. They are good for close-ups given their large depth of field, and I often grab my S90 for a close-up even if I'm carrying my DSLR, just because it's quicker and easier and the results are so good. And a less technical advantage is that people find them less intimidating - no one has ever refused to let me shoot them with the S90, but if I have the big Nikon they often get suspicious of my motives, and sometimes just refuse.
Since all my other gear is Nikon I would have liked to stayed with them so that I would get less confused moving between different menus and button layouts, and could use my big automatic flash, but for the last few years Canon have simply been way ahead on the pocket camera market, and the S90 was the first model that I considered to have sufficient quality in a small enough body to be worth buying. It's replacement, the S95, is very similar, but has higher resolution video.
Here are some more S90 examples.
Update 2014 : The S90 has finally been eclipsed after an impressive 5-year reign.
I now use a Sony RX100-II, which has significantly better image quality, but even better, it doesn't have the shutter lag of the Canon.
Here's a selection of pictures from it : RX100 examples.
Today I took a trip to The Butterfly House in Stockholm with Johannes
It was mostly for fun, but also a bit of training before my trip to Sri Lanka.
Being the first day after the school holidays it was very quiet and not much of a problem to use a tripod. Flashguns are 'discouraged', but the nice lady on the desk said that we could use them if a picture 'really needed it'. It was -5 C out, and we walked from the far car park, so it took 15 mins or so for the cameras to warm up and stop fogging. Next time I would put mine in a plastic bag and sit it on a microwaved bag of rice for the journey, and/or have it in the footwell of the car with the heater on. We chose a sunny day, but despite the buildings being made of glass, light was still a bit of a problem.
But there were plenty of pretty flowers and butterflies, and new ones were hatching all day. Definitely a place I'd recommend to go for an afternoon of shooting off season.
Here's the result : Butterfly show
Most of the pics were taken with a Sigma 150mm macro, apertures between f5.6 and f11.
Georg Lulich is off to host his LA exhibition during November, so I get to take over his gallery for the month. Amongst other things I'll be showing my canvas nature prints, some horse pictures, and I'll also be selling A5 greetings cards with winter and Uppsala motifs.
The opening is on Saturday 30th October, officially from 12-16, but probably longer since it's also the opening of the light festival that evening.
Then I'll be open every Saturday at least from 12-16, until the 27th November, which happens to be the first of advent.
Weekdays I'll open when I have free time, so call or mail if you're in town then and want to see if I'm there.
The Georg Lulich Gallery is in Walmstedska Garden, Sysslomansgatan 1, Uppsala.
That's between Saluhallen and Ofvendahls, next to Kultur Kafeet.
Nov 29 - And now it's over, so Georg's pictures will be back next weekend.
I had a lot of fun talking to the 500 visitors that passed through, and am very glad that I got the chance to do this. Here's what it looked like : (mini gallery show)
If you missed it, my next exhibition will be at Gottsunda library next March.
I managed to catch the last day of the autumn colours for a very quick advertising shoot for Nordisko at the weekend.
I get accused of overlighting portraits, but I hate shadows on faces, so here I used the sun, a large gold reflector, and on camera flash to lower the contrast. Perhaps the poses could have been a bit more imaginative, but I think they are going to look OK on the web site. The models were great, even though they are still at high school and had never modelled before. Really relaxed and natural, and easy to direct. I hope I can use them again.
More pics from the session are here.
I've resisted the temptation to blog for a long time, but since a lot of my friends ask me the same questions about cameras, I thought it might be a good idea to think about the answers a bit more carefully and publish my thoughts. I hope someone finds something useful here.
In case you don't know me, I'm a Brit who has been living in Sweden for 25 years, and having been earning my living as a freelance photographer for the past 10 years.
Blog experts insist that if you don't blog at least once a week, then you shouldn't blog at all. Well I'm afraid you won't get that frequency from me.
What you will get is a series of hopefully instructional posts scattered over many years. If I haven't blogged for a while it's not because I've stopped working, but the opposite - I haven't had time to write a well-thought-out post, and I'd rather wait until I can.
Meanwhile, more photographs and other information can be found at the Frozentime Images website.
And here's a chicken. He's called Linus.